Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gravel bars (GBs) contribute to carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions from stream corridors, with CO 2 concentrations and emissions dependent on prevailing hydraulic, biochemical, and physicochemical conditions. We investigated CO 2 concentrations and fluxes across a GB in a prealpine stream over three different discharge‐temperature conditions. By combining field data with a reactive transport groundwater model, we were able to differentiate the most relevant hydrological and biogeochemical processes contributing to CO 2 dynamics. GB CO 2 concentrations showed significant spatial and temporal variability and were highest under the lowest flow and highest temperature conditions. Further, observed GB surface CO 2 evasion fluxes, measured CO 2 concentrations, and modelled aerobic respiration were highest at the tail of the GB over all conditions. Modelled CO 2 transport via streamwater downwelling contributed the largest fraction of the measured GB CO 2 concentrations (31% to 48%). This contribution increased its relative share at higher discharges as a result of a decrease in other sources. Also, it decreased from the GB head to tail across all discharge‐temperature conditions. Aerobic respiration accounted for 17% to 36% of measured surface CO 2 concentrations. Zoobenthic respiration was estimated to contribute between 4% and 8%, and direct groundwater CO 2 inputs 1% to 23%. Unexplained residuals accounted for 6% to 37% of the observed CO 2 concentrations at the GB surface. Overall, we highlight the dynamic role of subsurface aerobic respiration as a driver of spatial and temporal variability of CO 2 concentrations and evasion fluxes from a GB. As hydrological regimes in prealpine streams are predicted to change following climatic change, we propose that warming temperatures combined with extended periods of low flow will lead to increased CO 2 release via enhanced aerobic respiration in newly exposed GBs in prealpine stream corridors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boodoo et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: