This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Family Law litigant dissatisfaction with psychological evaluations during high-conflict cases is common and can activate litigants to file ethics complaints or malpractice lawsuits. The most critical aspects of a standardized evaluation protocol that lead to litigants believing that they have been fairly and thoroughly evaluated are discussed specifically.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: