I think of myself as an empirical historian above all else. The starting point of my own work has always been to identify a substantial body of hitherto unexplored or little explored materials and to generate new empirical information from such materials. I have turned to theory mainly as an aid to develop, through engagement and dialogue with it, my own concepts based on the empirical findings. Epistemologically, I have consciously tried to proceed from empirical research to theory and back to empirical findings rather than the reverse. I do not see myself as a theorist and am not qualified to speak about theory in any theoretical way. All I can write about here is my own experience, the lessons I have drawn, and the issues and questions that have remained for me.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philip C. C. Huang (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: