Why the study?
Can inverse pulse wave transit time (IPWTT) series replace systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurements in multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) modeling of cardiovascular regulation?
Can inverse pulse wave transit time (IPWTT) series replace systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurements in multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) modeling of cardiovascular regulation?
Inverse pulse wave transit time can serve as a practical surrogate for continuous systolic blood pressure measurement in MVAR modeling of cardiovascular autonomic regulation.
May simplify continuous autonomic assessment in clinical exams; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
Short-term cardiovascular regulation mediated by the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system has been investigated by multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) modeling, providing insightful analysis. MVAR models employ, as inputs, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and respiratory waveforms. ECG (from which HR series is obtained) and respiratory flow waveform (RFW) can be easily sampled from the patients. Nevertheless, the available methods for acquisition of beat-to-beat SBP measurements during exams hamper the wider use of MVAR models in clinical research. Recent studies show an inverse correlation between pulse wave transit time (PWTT) series and SBP fluctuations. PWTT is the time interval between the ECG R-wave peak and photoplethysmography waveform (PPG) base point within the same cardiac cycle. This study investigates the feasibility of using inverse PWTT (IPWTT) series as an alternative input to SBP for MVAR modeling of the cardiovascular regulation. For that, HR, RFW, and IPWTT series acquired from volunteers during postural changes and autonomic blockade were used as input of MVAR models. Obtained results show that IPWTT series can be used as input of MVAR models, replacing SBP measurements in order to overcome practical difficulties related to the continuous sampling of the SBP during clinical exams.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giassi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: