Key result
Higher-grade centrum semiovale white matter lesions are linked to ~53% lower regional cerebral blood flow.
Cross-Sectional (n=135)
p-value: p=<0.005
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: White matter lesions (WMLs) on T2-weighted MR images occurring in the centrum semiovale of normal individuals are a subject of great clinical interest. We therefore investigated regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) of the centrum semiovale among neurologically normal individuals. METHODS: One hundred thirty-five neurologically normal subjects were divided into four grades of WML on the basis of their MR images. rCBF values in the centrum semiovale were measured by xenon contrast CT methods. RESULTS: Advanced age and associated hypertension were significant risk factors for higher grade WMLs. Centrum semiovale rCBF values on the left side were 24.27 +/- 2.60 mL.100 g-1.min-1 in grade 0, 23.52 +/- 2.78 in grade I, 19.35 +/- 2.81 in grade II, 15.82 +/- 2.05 in grade III, and 11.31 +/- 2.56 in grade IV. Differences were significant between grades (P < .005 between grade 0 and grades II, III, and IV; between grade II and grades III and IV; and between grades III and IV). Patients with hypertension had lower rCBF values than those without in grades 0, I, II, and III, with significant difference in grade I (P < .005). Age-matched studies between patients 61 to 70 years old confirmed a significant difference between WML grades. CONCLUSIONS: WMLs in centrum semiovale are associated with greater age, hypertension, and reduced rCBF values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyazawa et al. (1997) conducted a cross-sectional in White matter lesions (n=135). Higher grade white matter lesions vs. Grade 0 white matter lesions was evaluated on Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the left centrum semiovale (p=<0.005). Higher grades of white matter lesions in the centrum semiovale were associated with reduced regional cerebral blood flow, from 24.27 in grade 0 to 11.31 mL/100g/min in grade IV (P<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: