In attacking the problem of revolution, as most others of major significance in history, we historians should think twice before we spurn the help offered by our colleagues in the social sciences, who have, as it happens, been particularly active in the last few years in theorizing about the typology, causes, and evolutionary patterns of this particular phenomenon. The purpose of this article is not to advance any new hypothesis, but to provide a summary view and critical examination of the work that has been going on.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawrence Stone (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: