Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article derives the (asymptotic) variances and covariances – and hence standard errors – of quantile means and quantile shares in terms of explicit formulas that are distribution-free and easily computable. The article then develops a toolbox of quantile-based disaggregative inequality measures, based on the means and shares, which allow for detailed inferential analysis of income distributions in a straightforward unified framework. The analytical formulas are applied to Canadian Census public-use microdata files on workers’ earnings for 2000 and 2005. The results highlight the statistical significance of how upper-earnings levels have advanced beyond middle earnings, how much the share of mid-range earnings has eroded over even a five-year period, and how decile mean growth rates for women were everywhere higher than for men – except at the top decile, where the opposite phenomenon was highly significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beach et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: