Why the study?
Guidelines recommend DAPT for high-risk TIA and minor stroke presenting within 1-3 days, but real-world adherence data are limited.
Real-world DAPT adherence remains low among eligible high-risk TIA/minor stroke patients; leaves open the need for targeted implementation research.
Background and purpose Guidelines recommend patients with high-risk TIAs and minor stroke presenting within 1-3 days from onset be offered dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). There is little data on real-world adherence to these recommendations. We evaluated the appropriateness of DAPT use in TIA and stroke patients in a prospective Database. Methods The Qatar Stroke Database began enrollment of patients with TIAs and acute stroke in 2014 and currently has ∼ 16,000 patients. For this study we evaluated the rates of guideline-adherent use of antiplatelet treatment at the time of discharge in patients with TIAs and stroke. TIAs were considered high-risk with ABCD2 score of ⍰ 4 and minor stroke was defined as NIHSS ⍰ 3. Patient demographics, clinical features, risk factors, previous medications, imaging and laboratory investigations, final diagnosis, discharge medications, and discharge and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were analyzed. Results After excluding patients with ICH, mimics and rare secondary causes, 8082 patients available for final analysis (TIAs: 1357;stroke 6725). In high-risk TIAs, 282 of 666 (42.3%) patients were discharged on DAPT. In patients with minor stroke, 1207 of 3572 (33.8%) patients were discharged on DAPT. DAPT was inappropriately offered to 238 of 691 (34.4%) of low-risk TIAs and 809 of 3153 (25.7%) of non-minor stroke patients. Conclusions This large database of prospectively collected patients with TIAs and stroke shows that, unfortunately, despite several guidelines, a large majority of patients with TIAs and stroke are receiving inappropriate antiplatelet treatment at discharge from hospital. This requires urgent attention and further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naveed et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: