At the present time there exist a number of different approaches to the problem of coupling parametrized physical processes to the dynamical core in operational numerical weather‐prediction (NWP) and climate models. Motivated by the various strategies in use, some idealized representative coupling schemes are constructed and subsequently analysed using a methodology in which the physics and dynamics terms are represented in a simplified way. Particular numerical properties of the idealized schemes which are of interest are the ability to capture correct steady‐state solutions and to be second‐order accurate in time. In general, the schemes require specific choices for the time‐differencing of certain coupled processes if correct steady‐state solutions are to be obtained. This has implications for the overall numerical stability of a coupling strategy. An alternative physics–dynamics coupling approach is then described and analysed. A multiple‐sweep predictor–corrector coupling scheme is shown to capture the correct steady‐state solution and to allow for second‐order accuracy, provided that the convective process is coupled explicitly. This approach has a number of advantages over those currently used in operational NWP models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dubal et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: