Energy balance studies require knowledge of the heat flux at the soil surface. This flux is determined by summing the heat flux at a reference depth ( z r ) some centimeters below the surface and the rate of change of heat storage in the soil above z r . The rate of change of heat storage, or heat storage for short (Δ S ), is calculated from soil volumetric heat capacity ( C ) and temperature. The objectives of this study were to determine how choices regarding z r , C measurements, and Δ S calculations all affect the accuracy of Δ S data. Heat transfer theory and data from three field sites were used toward these ends. In some studies, shallow reference depths have been used and Δ S neglected. Our results indicate that when z r is sufficiently deep to permit accurate heat flux measurements, Δ S is too large to neglect. Three methods for determining C were evaluated: soil sampling, the ThetaProbe soil moisture sensor, and heat pulse sensors. When C was determined using all three methods simultaneously, the estimates agreed to within 6% on average; however, the temporal variability of C was best recorded with the automated heat pulse sensors. Three approaches for calculating Δ S were also tested. The common approach of letting C vary in time but neglecting its time derivative caused errors when soil water content was changing. These errors exceeded 200 W m −2 in some cases. The simple approach of assuming a constant C performed similarly. We introduce a third approach that accounts for the time derivative of C and yields the most accurate Δ S data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ochsner et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: