Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of mononuclear ruthenium polypyridyl complexes [Ru(Mebimpy)(pic)(3)](PF(6))(2) (2; Mebimpy = 2,6-bis(1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine; pic = 4-picoline), Ru(bimpy)(pic)(3) (3; H(2)bimpy = 2,6-bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine), trans-[Ru(terpy)(pic)(2)Cl](PF(6)) (4; terpy = 2,2';6',2"-terpyridine), and trans-[Ru(terpy)(pic)(2)(OH(2))](ClO(4))(2) (5) are synthesized and characterized as analogues of the known Ru complex, [Ru(terpy)(pic)(3)](PF(6))(2) (1). The effect of the ligands on electronic and catalytic properties is studied and discussed. The negatively charged ligand, bimpy(2-), has a remarkable influence on the electrochemical events due to its strong electron-donating ability. The performance in light- and Ce(IV)-driven (Ce(IV) = Ce(NH(4))(2)(NO(3))(6)) water oxidation is successfully demonstrated. We propose that ligand exchange between pic and H(2)O occurs to form the real catalyst, a Ru-aqua complex. The synthesis and testing of trans-[Ru(terpy)(pic)(2)(OH(2))](ClO(4))(2) (5) confirmed our proposal. In addition, complex 5 possesses the best catalytic activity among these five complexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: