Pilot study reveals nitrous oxide drives over eighty percent of greenhouse gas emissions in aerobic granular sludge wastewater treatment, highlighting the critical climate impact of nitrogen removal.
The assessment of nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from wastewater treatment processes using aerobic granular biomass is still scarce and most of them deal with synthetic wastewater in well-controlled conditions. Also, the greenhouse gases footprint from aerobic granular process has been poorly described despite a strong impact on climate change. This work quantified and analyzed the N2O and CO2 emissions, as well as the treatment efficiency of a pilot-scale sequencing batch reactor with aerobic granular sludge (AGS) fed with real domestic wastewater. The operational conditions applied to the reactor allowed the development of AGS (1.7 ± 0.40 gVSS/L), with good settleability (SVI30 < 50 mL/g) and removal efficiencies of 84% for BOD5 and 65% for NH4+-N. The relative amount of nitrogen denitrified to N2O was 22.9%, which corresponded to an emission factor () of 5.67% ± 1.68%. The contribution of N2O emitted through the gas phase was 97.1%, with a flow-based emission factor () of 3.65 × 10−3 g N2O-N/L, while the contribution of N2O released through the liquid phase was 2.9%, with a flow-based release factor () of 0.11 × 10−3 g N2O-N/L. Although CO2 flow-based emission factor () was higher (0.297 g CO2/L), in terms of carbon footprint, the global warming impact of N2O was five times higher than the impact of CO2 emissions ( of 83.6% and of 16.4%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daudt et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: