Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary The nutrient status of soils from Macrotermes termite mounds, in and around Kajiado District, reflects that of the subsoils more closely than in some other studies, notably Watson (1977). Consequently the growth of vegetation on and around mounds was not noticeably enhanced, except in grasslands and in higher rainfall areas. There was no evidence that mounds acted as wicks. Mound soils contained greater concentrations of calcium, magnesium and potassium than subsoils in almost all cases where subsoil values were low, suggesting that the termites’ activities enhanced the nutrient status of mound soils. The nutrients were probably derived from their food, and the effects increased in some cases by their selection of clay on clay‐poor soils. Nevertheless, the overall effects of Macrotermes on rangeland soils are probably small. The distribution of Macrotermes is remarkably unaffected by soil types; they construct mounds on almost all soils except those consisting largely of montmorillonite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Derek Pomeroy (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: