Many papers appearing in journals reporting computational experiments use computer generated evidence to compare or rank competing mathematical software techmques. Unfortunately, to date there have been no standards or gmdehnes indicating how computer experiments should be conducted or how the results should be presented. An initial attempt is made to rectify this situation, and a summary of unportant points which should be considered when writing or evaluating a paper m which computational results are reported is provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crowder et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: