Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary. The interpretation of European Neolithic enclosures must take account of their wide variability in chronology, size, shape, topographical position and material. Such interpretations should rely on the comparative analysis of the processes at work in particular regions. Newly recovered data from small early third millennium cal BC ditched enclosures in central Iberia, with high densities of features and domestic refuse, support the hypothesis of permanent habitation. This paper argues that the variability in late Neolithic–Chalcolithic enclosures throughout Iberia is a result of the cycling of fission and fusion characteristic of segmentary social dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedro Díaz del Río Español (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: