Editorials1 June 1982Toxic Shock: Problems in Definition and Diagnosis of a New SyndromeLEWIS W. WANNAMAKER, M.D.LEWIS W. WANNAMAKER, M.D.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-96-6-775 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ExcerptNot since the sudden emergence of Legionnaires' disease has a seemingly new clinical entity aroused such widespread national interest and anxiety as toxic shock syndrome. The importance of the problem stems not so much from the number of definite cases reported (1), fewer than 2000, but from the recognition that the syndrome is a rare but often serious illness with a special affinity for young women, one that not only threatens their lives but also raises new considerations about an important aspect of their life-style—the use of tampons during menstruation. The prominence of toxic shock syndrome has been enhanced by...References1. . Report of Committee on Toxic Shock Syndrome. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences; 1982. (In press.) Google Scholar2. BARTLETTREINGOLDGRAHAM PAD. Toxic shock syndrome associated with surgical wound infections. JAMA. 1982;247:1448-50. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. REINGOLDHARGRETTDANSHANDSSTRICKLANDBROOME ANBKBC. Nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome: a review of 130 cases. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96(6 Pt 2):871-4. LinkGoogle Scholar4. OSTERHOLMDAVISGIBSON MJR. Tri-State Toxic Shock Syndrome Study: I. Epidemiologic findings. J Infect Dis. 1982;145: 431-40. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. OSTERHOLMDAVIDHELMS MJC. Tri-State Toxic Shock Syndrome Study: II. Clinical and laboratory findings. J Infect Dis. 1982;145:441-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. OSTERHOLMFORFANG MJ. Toxic-shock syndrome in Minnesota: results of an active-passive surveillance system. J Infect Dis. 1982; 145:458-64. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. DAVISVERGERONT JJ. The effect of publicity on the reporting of toxic-shock syndrome in Wisconsin. J Infect Dis. 1982;145:449-57. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. TODDFISHAUTKAPRALWELCH JMFT. Toxic-shock syndrome associated with phage-group-I staphylococci. Lancet. 1978;2:1116-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. STEVENS F. The occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus infection with a scarlatiniform rash. JAMA. 1927;88:1957-8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar10. ARANOWWOOD HW. Staphylococci infection simulating scarlet fever. JAMA. 1942;119:1491-5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar11. DUNNETSCHALLIBAUM WE. Scarlet-fever-like illness due to staphylococcal infection. Lancet. 1960;2:1227-9. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. HLADNYMETZ JH. Mixed infections by hemolyzing streptococci in clinical material. Zbl Bakt Hyg. 1976; I A: 177-88. Google Scholar13. WINSLOWLOEBRAHIMTOOLAKAMATHGUNNAR EHSSR. Hemodynamic studies and results of therapy in 50 patients with bacteremic shock. Am J Med. 1973;54:421-32. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14. REINGOLDHARGRETTSHANDS ANK. Toxic shock syndrome surveillance in the United States, 1980 to 1981. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96(6 Pt 2):875-80. LinkGoogle Scholar15. WOLFF S. Biological effects of bacterial endotoxins in man. J Infect Dis. 1973;128:S259-64. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16. KASSPORTERMCGILLVIVALDI EPME. Clinical and experimental observations on the significance of endotoxemia. J Infect Dis. 1973;128:S299-302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar17. SCHLIEVERTSHANDSDANSCHMIDNISHIMURA PKBGR. Identification and characterization of an exotoxin from Staphylococcus aureus associated with toxic-shock syndrome. J Infect Dis. 1981; 143:509-15. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18. FISHERGOODPASTUREPETERIEVOTH RHJD. Toxic shock syndrome in menstruating women. Ann Intern Med. 1981;94:156-63. LinkGoogle Scholar19. STOLLERMANMARKOWITZTARANTAWANNAMAKERWHITTEMORE GMALR. American Heart Association committee report: Jones Criteria (revised) for guidance in the diagnosis of rheumatic fever. Circulation. 1965;32:664-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20. DISCIASCIOTARANTA GA. Rheumatic fever in children. Am Heart J. 1980;99:635-58. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21. THOMPSONGLASGOWWARPINSKIOLSON JLJC. Infant botulism: clinical spectrum and epidemiology. Pediatrics. 1980;66: 936-42. MedlineGoogle Scholar This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byBacterial InfectionsTwo cases of severe infection with beta-haemolytic group A streptococci associated with a toxic-shock-like syndromeThe Toxic Shock Syndrome and Streptococcal Pyrogenic ExotoxinsRICHARD WILLOUGHBY, M.D., RICHARD N. GREENBERG, M.D.Toxic Shock Syndrome: A RepriseEDWARD H. KASS, M.D., PH.D. 1 June 1982Volume 96, Issue 6_Part_1Page: 775-777KeywordsAnxietyLegionellosisShockToxic shock syndrome Issue Published: 1 June 1982 PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewis W. Wannamaker (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: