Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The charging free energy of a model diatomic molecule is studied with free energy simulations and continuum dielectric methods. A comparison of the two methods shows that continuum dielectric theory can successfully encapsulate the nonlinear solvent responses around the solute if the dielectric boundary is defined by 1 / 2 ( R atom, i + R g max, i ), where R atom, i is the atomic radius of solute atom i, and R g max, i is the first peak position of the solute atom−solvent atom radial number/charge density distribution function. Furthermore, continuum dielectric theory in conjunction with the two-sphere description of the dielectric boundary can reproduce simultaneously the electrostatic solvation free energies, as well as the solvent-induced electrostatic potentials and field components at the solute sites derived from simulations in the presence of explicit solvent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babu et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: