Why the study?
Does the use of muscle velocity recovery cycles (MVRCs) combined with repetitive stimulation improve the identification of sarcolemmal dysfunction in patients with Andersen-Tawil syndrome compared to controls?
Does the use of muscle velocity recovery cycles (MVRCs) combined with repetitive stimulation improve the identification of sarcolemmal dysfunction in patients with Andersen-Tawil syndrome compared to controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MVRCs combined with repetitive stimulation differentiated Andersen-Tawil syndrome patients from controls more effectively than the conventional long-exercise test.
INTRODUCTION: Andersen-Tawil syndrome (ATS) due to Kir2.1mutations typically manifests as periodic paralysis, cardiac arrhythmias and developmental abnormalities but is often difficult to diagnose clinically. This study was undertaken to determine whether sarcolemmal dysfunction could be identified with muscle velocity recovery cycles (MVRCs). METHODS: Eleven genetically confirmed ATS patients and 20 normal controls were studied. MVRCs were recorded with 1, 2, and 5 conditioning stimuli and with single conditioning stimuli during intermittent repetitive stimulation at 20 Hz, in addition to the long exercise test. RESULTS: ATS patients had longer relative refractory periods (P < 0.0001) and less early supernormality, consistent with membrane depolarization. Patients had reduced enhancement of late supernormality with 5 conditioning stimuli (P < 0.0001), and less latency reduction during repetitive stimulation (P < 0.001). Patients were separated completely from controls by combining MVRC and repetitive stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: MVRCs combined with repetitive stimulation differentiated ATS patients from controls more effectively than the conventional long-exercise test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: