In an in vitro porcine model, halothane demonstrated greater potency than isoflurane in relaxing previously constricted coronary artery segments.
May inform volatile anesthetic choice in coronary disease; leaves open translation of porcine in vitro findings to humans.
Coronary vasodilation by halothane and isoflurane were compared using in vitro tension recording. Porcine left anterior descending coronary arterial segments (1.5-2.0 mm o.d.) were constricted with either K+ (30 mM) or prostanoid U44069 (6 X 10(-7) M) in the absence of other drugs or anesthetics. Following stabilization of constriction, arteries were exposed to halothane or isoflurane at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0% concentrations. K+ (30 mM) induced constriction was reduced by halothane at 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0% and U44069 (6 X 10(-7) M) induced constriction was reduced at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0%. K+ (30 mM) induced constriction was reduced by isoflurane only at 3.0% and U44069 (6 X 10(-7) M) induced constriction was reduced by isoflurane only at 2.0 and 3.0%. U44069 induced constriction was more susceptible than K+ induced constriction to relaxation by halothane or isoflurane. Halothane was more potent than isoflurane as a direct relaxant of porcine epicardial left anterior descending arterial segments previously constricted with K+ (30 mM) or U44069 (6 X 10(-7) M).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bollen et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: