Why the study?
Does L-NMMA infusion alter the optimality ratio of retinal vascular bifurcations in healthy normotensive male volunteers?
Does L-NMMA infusion alter the optimality ratio of retinal vascular bifurcations in healthy normotensive male volunteers?
The optimality ratio is a robust measure of vascular bifurcation geometry, and its increase following L-NMMA infusion suggests it may be a useful in vivo indicator of microvascular endothelial dysfunction.
Supports retinal bifurcation optimality ratio as a non-invasive marker of microvascular endothelial dysfunction; extends retinal imaging validation to NO-dependent pathways.
Conventionally, the relationship between parent and daughter vessels at vascular bifurcations has been expressed by the junction exponent (x), and deviations of this parameter from the optimal conditions predicted by Murray's law (x = 3) have been shown to be associated with vascular disease. However, the junction exponent is normally calculated iteratively from diameter measurements, and Monte-Carlo simulation studies show the junction exponent to be biased in the presence of measurement noise.We present an alternative parameter, referred to as optimality ratio, that is simpler to compute and also more robust in the presence of noise.To demonstrate the sensitivity of the optimality ratio to alterations in topography of the retinal vascular network, we analysed the effect of inducing endothelial dysfunction by infusion of NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, compared to placebo in a double-blind crossover study. The optimality ratio showed a significant increase (p = 0.03) during infusion of l-NMMA compared to placebo.We propose that a measure of the extent of departure of optimality ratio from its optimal value of 2(-1/3) may be a useful indicator of microvascular endothelial dysfunction in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Witt et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: