Why the study?
Anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging and interventions has increased alongside changes in scanner strength, device safety terminology, and implant conditionality, in an environment that remains unfamiliar to many anaesthetists.
These guidelines provide recommendations for the safe provision of anaesthesia in magnetic resonance units, emphasizing multidisciplinary decision-making and appropriate training.
Rising MRI anaesthesia demand with conditional devices extends access; leaves open standardization of updated safety terminology and protocols.
There has been an increase in the number of units providing anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging and the strength of magnetic resonance scanners, as well as the number of interventions and operations performed within the magnetic resonance environment. More devices and implants are now magnetic resonance imaging conditional, allowing scans to be undertaken in patients for whom this was previously not possible. There has also been a revision in terminology relating to magnetic resonance safety of devices. These guidelines have been put together by organisations who are involved in the pathways for patients needing magnetic resonance imaging. They reinforce the safety aspects of providing anaesthesia in the magnetic resonance environment, from the multidisciplinary decision making process, the seniority of anaesthetist accompanying the patient, to training in the recognition of hazards of anaesthesia in the magnetic resonance environment. For many anaesthetists this is an unfamiliar site to give anaesthesia, often in a remote site. Hospitals should develop and audit governance procedures to ensure that anaesthetists of all grades are competent to deliver anaesthesia safely in this area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: