Reliable city-level energy use and energy-related CO₂ inventories are essential for evidence-based climate governance, yet city energy statistics by energy type and sector remain unavailable for most Chinese prefecture-level cities. Conventional top-down allocation (TDA) method based on province-average energy intensity are therefore widely used, but they assume that all cities within the same province have the same energy intensity because city-level energy intensity data were previously unavailable. This may lead to substantial deviations between the estimated results and actual city-level energy use. To address this problem, this study develops a modified TDA (MTDA) method by introducing the ratio of city-level to provincial energy intensity into the allocation coefficient. Applied to Guangdong province from 2010 to 2022, the method constructs continuous city-level energy-related CO 2 inventories for 21 cities. Benchmark validation against published city statistics shows strong agreement between the MTDA estimates and observed values ( R 2 = 0.99), supporting the reliability of the reconstructed inventory. The difference between MTDA and TDA increases with the deviation of city-level energy intensity from the provincial average ( R 2 = 0.908), indicating that the intensity adjustment captures inter-city heterogeneity. Based on the joint pattern of emission scale and carbon intensity, the 21 cities are classified into three categories: high emission scale-dominated cities, high emission intensity-dominated cities, and moderate emission cities. The results further show that, in Guangdong, urban energy system optimization, production-side industrial decarbonization, and low-carbon development-path guidance are the key mitigation directions for these three categories, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: