Instrumentation kinematics does not affect bacterial reduction, post‐operative pain, and flare‐ups: A randomized clinical trial

AIM: This randomized clinical trial aimed to assess the effect of instrumentation kinematics (reciprocation or continuous rotation) on bacterial reduction, post-operative pain, and incidence of flare-ups after root canal treatment of single-rooted mandibular premolars with asymptomatic apical periodontitis. METHODOLOGY: Sixty-six patients were included in this prospective, parallel, randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups (N = 33) according to the kinematics of the shaping instrument: WaveOne Gold (WO) used in reciprocation or One Shape (OS) used in continuous rotation. Under complete asepsis, bacterial samples were taken before (S1) and after (S2) a standard cleaning and shaping protocol. Evaluation of bacterial reduction was done by both culture technique and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis. Post-operative pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) after 24, 48, and 72 h following treatment, while flare-ups were recorded as a binary outcome (Yes/No). Independent and paired t-tests were used for inter- and intra-group comparisons for bacterial count data, respectively. For post-operative pain score, inter-group comparisons were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test while intra-group comparisons were analyzed using Friedman test followed by pairwise comparisons utilizing the Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. The significance level was set at p ≤ .05 within all tests. RESULTS: All the allocated participants received the intervention and were analysed. The comparison between culture and qPCR methods showed that qPCR analysis demonstrated significantly higher pre-instrumentation baseline bacterial count (p < .05). The percentage of bacterial reduction, detected by either method, significantly decreased after instrumentation using either rotation or reciprocation kinematics (p < .05). However, the difference between the WOG or OS files was statistically non-significant (p > .05). The intra-group comparisons showed a significant reduction in post-operative pain with time (p < .05) for both groups. However, the inter-group comparison demonstrated that the difference in post-operative pain after the use of either WOG or OS was statistically non-significant (p > .05). The incidence of flare-ups between both groups was also not-significant (p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Shaping kinematics, either rotation or reciprocation motions, had no impact on bacterial reduction and the incidence of post-operative pain and flare-ups after root canal preparation of single-rooted premolars with asymptomatic apical periodontitis.