Why the study?
Current treatment trials in Danon disease are lacking, and therapeutic decisions are extrapolated from hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy guidelines.
This review highlights the clinical characteristics, genetics, and management of Danon disease, emphasizing the need for specific therapeutic trials and natural history studies.
May inform diagnosis and management of rare Danon disease; leaves open need for targeted therapies in prospective trials.
Introduction: Danon disease (DD) is a rare X-linked dominant cardioskeletal myopathy where phenotypic expression varies by sex. It is characterized by severe cardiomyopathy, skeletal myopathy, and cognitive impairment, but can include retinopathy, gastrointestinal, hepatic and pulmonary manifestations.Areas covered: This review of DD will cover genetics, pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical characteristics and diagnostics, and management, and synthesizes Danon Disease literature found In PubMed from 2000 to the present. Clinical reviews, outcomes studies, registry data, case series and mechanistic studies and chapters were reviewed.Expert opinion: DD is caused by mutations in the lysosome-associated membrane protein-2 (LAMP-2) gene which is involved in autophagy. Diagnosis is aided by an x-linked hereditary pattern coupled with clinical history suggesting a cardiomyopathy with multi-organ dysfunction, neurocognitive deficits, myopathy and visual defects. Current treatment trials in DD are lacking and therapeutic decisions are extrapolated from guidelines for hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies. The efficacy of these treatments as well as therapies specific to DD are important areas for research. Natural history studies that can inform therapeutic trial design as well as comparative effectiveness research specific to DD and other cardiomyopathies can bridge critical knowledge gaps in DD therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: