Why the study?
Stroke sequelae may induce variations affecting the reproducibility of physiological responses to CPET, which had not been established in people with stroke.
Are heart rate and oxygen consumption measurements at ventilatory thresholds and peak effort reproducible during repeated cardiopulmonary exercise tests in people with stroke?
Are heart rate and oxygen consumption measurements at ventilatory thresholds and peak effort reproducible during repeated cardiopulmonary exercise tests in people with stroke?
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing yields highly reliable and reproducible measurements of heart rate and oxygen consumption in stroke patients with hemiparesis.
CPET reproducibility in stroke remains uncertain; leaves open standardized protocols for reliable cardiorespiratory assessment in rehabilitation.
Background A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is used to determine the ventilatory thresholds and to directly assess cardiorespiratory capacity. However, its reproducibility should be tested in people with stroke as sequelae imposed by the stroke may induce important variations among and within each subject, affecting the reproducibility of the physiological responses to CPET.Purpose This cross-sectional repeated measures study design aims to determine the reproducibility of anaerobic threshold (AT), respiratory compensation point (RCP), and maximal cardiorespiratory capacity assessed during a CPET in people with stroke.Methods Twenty-eight subjects with hemiparesis after stroke aging 60 ± 13 years were submitted to two treadmill CPETs with identical protocols.Data Analysis The reproducibility of heart rate (HR) and oxygen consumption (VO2) obtained at AT, RCP, and peak effort was evaluated by systematic error (paired t-test); reliability (ICC and 95% confidence interval); and agreement (typical error and coefficient of variation).Results There were no systematic errors for HR and VO2assessed at AT, RCP, and peak effort (p > 0,05). Reliability was high for these variables during CPET (ICCs > 0.93). Agreement was good for all variables. Typical errors for HR and VO2 assessed at AT, RCP, and peak effort were, respectively, 7, 7, and 8 bpm, and 1.51, 1.44, and 1.57 ml.kg−1.min−1. Coefficients of variation assessed at AT, RCP, and peak effort were, respectively, 5.7, 5.1, and 6.0% for HR and 8.7, 7.3, and 7.5% for VO2.Conclusions HR and VO2 measured at AT, RCP, and peak effort during a treadmill CPET present good reproducibility in people with stroke, showing high reliability and good agreement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sousa et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: