Why the study?
Does hand dominance affect the magnitude of inspiratory gasp response in healthy subjects?
Does hand dominance affect the magnitude of inspiratory gasp response in healthy subjects?
Hand dominance does not significantly affect the magnitude of inspiratory gasp responses, supporting its use in evaluating unilateral sympathetic dysfunction without needing to adjust for dominance.
Hand dominance need not affect IGR interpretation; supports its use in unilateral sympathetic assessment without dominance adjustment.
Single rapid and deep inspirations (inspiratory gasps, IG) result in arteriolar vasoconstriction with concomitant transient decreases in skin blood flow that are most prominent in fingers and toes. Vascular responses (inspiratory gasp responses, IGR) are determined as the maximum percentage reduction in blood flow and have been used to assess sympathetic neurovascular function in several conditions. Previous studies have described various features of the response but there has been no reported systematic investigation of the degree of similarity between IGR obtained on dominant and non-dominant hands. This aspect is important in procedures that may use IGR to evaluate suspected unilateral sympathetic dysfunction of a limb-pair or to test the effectiveness of physiological interventions imposed on a single limb of a pair. Thus, the goal of our study was to compare IGR magnitudes that were simultaneously determined in paired-fingers of dominant and non-dominant hands. In 30 healthy seated subjects, skin blood perfusion via laser-Doppler (SBF) was measured on the dorsum of the middle finger of both hands while subjects performed three sequential IG at 3-min intervals. Analysis of variance for repeated measures revealed no significant difference in IGR between dominant (79.3 +/- 11.2%) and non-dominant hands (81.9 +/- 11.6%, P = 0.965) with an overall IGR of 80.6 +/- 11.4%. These results indicate that hand-dominance is not a factor that is likely to significantly effect IGR differentials determined in paired-limbs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayrovitz et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: