The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters (horizontal attachment levels [CAL-H], class of furcation invasion). Replicate measurements of CAL-H and furcation class were performed within 14 days in 420 molars of 105 patients with advanced periodontitis using a Nabers- (n=50), a TPS- (n=30) and a PCPUNC15-probe (n=25). Validity of clinical assessments was assessed by intrasurgical measurements. The standard deviation of single measurements (s) was calculated as a measure of the reproducibility of CAL-H measurements and weighted kappa-coefficients (Kw) to estimate the agreement of furcation class assessments. The s ranged from 0.55 to 1.13 mm (Nabers), 0.55 to 1.02 mm (TPS), and 0.58 to 1.11 mm (PCPUNC15). For all probes, a statistically significantly smaller measurement error was observed in buccal and lingual sites than in mesiolingual and distolingual furcations (P < 0.005). The Kw ranged from 0.59 to 0.89 (Nabers), 0.50 to 0.80 (TPS), and 0.53 to 0.72 (PCPUNC 15). Multiple linear regression analysis identified distolingual location, probing depth (PD) and CAL-H as factors influencing the variability of CAL-H measurements. Whereas there was no statistically significant difference between pre- and intrasurgical CAL-H measurements using the Nabers probe, the TPS and PCPUNC15 probe underestimated CAL-H for distolingual furcations (P < 0.025). Using the Nabers probe, no asymmetries between pre- and intrasurgically obtained class of furcation involvement were revealed, while the TPS and PCPUNC15 probe underestimated furcation degrees (P < 0.1). Multiple linear regression analysis identified distolingual location and height of furcation, as well as PD, vertical attachment level (CAL-V) and type of probe, as factors influencing the validity of CAL-H measurements. Clinical diagnosis of furcation lesions using the 3 mm incrementally marked Nabers probe provides reproducible and valid information about furcation invasion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eickholz et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: