Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Here we use electron energy-loss spectroscopy in a monochromated transmission electron microscope with 100 meV energy resolution and 2 {} spatial resolution to show that the electronic structure of face centered cubic {γ} and double hexagonal close-packed {β} cerium are considerably different, contrary to previous assumptions in literature. These results are supported by synchrotron-radiation-based x-ray absorption, multielectronic atomic spectral simulations, and local density approximation calculations, illustrating that changes in {111} stacking sequences can drive substantial electronic changes in close-packed phases of cerium that have a similar atomic volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: