Key result
Upper limb impairment and Berg Balance scores accurately distinguish ambulatory status after stroke.
Cross-Sectional (n=33)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine if ambulatory function is governed by motor impairment of limbs or balance ability in subjects with hemiplegia caused by stroke. DESIGN: Seven patients who walked with physical assistance (FIM 4) after stroke and 13 who walked independently with assistive devices (FIM 6) were compared with 13 healthy subjects. Motor impairment of limbs was evaluated with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. The Berg Balance Scale and limit of stability test of the Smart Balance Master were used to evaluate balance ability. RESULTS: The FIM 6 group and the controls were best differentiated by motor impairment of the paretic limbs and limit of stability in the backward direction. Motor impairment of the upper limb and limit of stability in direction toward the paretic side separated the FIM 4 from the FIM 6 group. Upper limb motor impairment and the Berg Balance Scale consistently separated the three subject groups. CONCLUSIONS: Motor impairment in the paretic upper limb and balance dysfunction should be addressed in treatments working toward independent ambulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Au-Yeung et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in Hemiplegia caused by stroke (n=33). Motor impairment of limbs (Fugl-Meyer Assessment) and balance ability (Berg Balance Scale and Smart Balance Master limit of stability) vs. Healthy subjects and differing levels of ambulatory function (FIM 4 vs FIM 6) was evaluated on Discrimination of ambulatory status (FIM 4, FIM 6, and healthy controls). Upper limb motor impairment and Berg Balance Scale scores consistently separated stroke patients walking with assistance (FIM 4, n=7), independently with devices (FIM 6, n=13), and controls (n=13).
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: