Why the study?
LVSD decreases global cerebral blood flow and predisposes to hypoperfusion, but its relationship with clinical outcomes in patients with anterior cerebral circulation LVO undergoing ET was unclear.
Does left ventricular systolic dysfunction predict poor functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
Does left ventricular systolic dysfunction predict poor functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pre-existing left ventricular systolic dysfunction is associated with poorer functional recovery in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy (ET) has transformed acute ischemic stroke (AIS) therapy in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) decreases global cerebral blood flow and predisposes to hypoperfusion. We evaluated the relationship between LVSD, as measured by LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and clinical outcomes in patients with anterior cerebral circulation LVO who underwent ET. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study examined anterior circulation LVO AIS patients from six international stroke centers. LVSD was measured by assessment of the echocardiographic LVEF using Simpson's biplane method of discs according to international guidelines. LVSD was defined as LVEF <50%. The primary outcome was defined as a good functional outcome using a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2 at 3 months. RESULTS: We included 440 AIS patients with LVO who underwent ET. On multivariate analyses, pre-existing diabetes mellitus (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.39;p=0.005), unsuccessful reperfusion (Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) grade 0-2a) status (OR 4.21, 95% CI 2.04 to 8.66; p<0.001) and LVSD (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.68; p=0.011) were independent predictors of poor functional outcomes at 3 months. On ordinal (shift) analyses, LVSD was associated with an unfavorable shift in the mRS outcomes (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.53; p<0.001) after adjusting for age and ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSION: Anterior circulation LVO AIS patients with LVSD have poorer outcomes after ET, suggesting the need to consider cardiac factors for ET, the degree of monitoring and prognostication post-procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: