Why the study?
Do gradients in membrane properties and electrical coupling allow the sinoatrial node to normally pace and drive the atrial muscle?
Do gradients in membrane properties and electrical coupling allow the sinoatrial node to normally pace and drive the atrial muscle?
Computational modeling demonstrates that gradients in both membrane properties (Nav1.5) and electrical coupling (Cx43) from the center to the periphery of the sinoatrial node are essential for normal pacemaking and driving of atrial muscle.
Model results require dual gradients for SAN pacemaking; leaves open human translation and therapeutic relevance.
The sinoatrial node (SAN) is heterogeneous in terms of cell size, ion channels, current densities, connexins and electrical coupling. For example, Nav1.5 (responsible for INa) and Cx43 (responsible for electrical coupling) are absent from the centre of the SAN (normally the leading pacemaker site), but present in the periphery (at SAN-atrial muscle junction). To test whether the heterogeneity is important for the functioning of the SAN, one- and two-dimensional models of the SAN and surrounding atrial muscle were created. Normal functioning of the SAN (in terms of cycle length, position of leading pacemaker site, conduction times, activation and repolarization sequences and space constants) was observed when, from the centre to the periphery, (i) cell characteristics (cell size and ionic current densities) were changed in a gradient fashion from a central-type (lacking INa) to a peripheral-type (possessing INa) and (ii) coupling conductance was increased in a gradient fashion. We conclude that the heterogeneous nature of the node is important for its normal functioning. The presence of Nav1.5 and Cx43 in the periphery may be essential for the node to be able to drive the atrial muscle: Nav1.5 provides the necessary depolarizing current and Cx43 delivers it to the atrial muscle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inada et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: