This study develops an automated end-to-end airfoil-optimization framework that couples parametric modeling, genetic algorithms (GA), and CFD simulation to improve the aerodynamic performance of RAE and NACA series airfoils across multiple angles of attack. Airfoil geometry is parametrized using the Class-Shape Transformation (CST) method, with ten Bernstein-polynomial control points per surface and two shape parameters (N,M), giving 22 design variables encoded in 16-bit binary strings. The GA evolves airfoil populations to maximize the lift-to-drag ratio ( CL/CD ), while a Python-driven workflow automates geometry generation, CFD meshing, simulation, and aerodynamic-coefficient extraction, reducing manual data transfer and improving procedural consistency. Optimization over eight angles of attack ( 0∘ – 17.5∘ ) shows consistent CL/CD gains, with different geometry trends under low, moderate, and high angles of attack. The results indicate larger and more stable benefits under low-to-moderate angles and diminishing gains under high-angle conditions. Pearson-correlation sensitivity analysis further identifies CST control regions that have stronger influence on CL/CD , providing design-space information for possible parameter reduction. The results show that the proposed workflow can support multi-airfoil, multi-angle optimization and provide a basis for future extensions, such as surrogate-model-assisted or machine-learning-driven multi-objective optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orban et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: