Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 1, 2005Journal of Separation Science

Comparing monolithic and microparticular capillary columns for the separation and analysis of peptide mixtures by liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HTHansjörg TollRWReiner WintringerUSU. Schweiger-Hufnagel

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Toll et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70b8906ceb2bbd16dff98ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200500155
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1High-Performance Liquid Chromatography−Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Using Monolithic Capillary Columns for Proteomic Studies2001 · 208 citations
  2. 2Monolithic, “Molded”, Porous Materials with High Flow Characteristics for Separations, Catalysis, or Solid-Phase Chemistry:  Control of Porous Properties during Polymerization1996 · 466 citations
  3. 3Comparison of the efficiency of microparticulate and monolithic capillary columns2004 · 48 citations
  4. 4Preparation and use of packed capillary columns in chromatographic and related techniques2004 · 23 citations
  5. 5Ultra-High-Efficiency Strong Cation Exchange LC/RPLC/MS/MS for High Dynamic Range Characterization of the Human Plasma Proteome2004 · 297 citations