Why the study?
Insight was needed into how people cope with living with AF and taking oral anticoagulants to inform improvements in healthcare delivery and patient support.
Patients with atrial fibrillation in a socioeconomically deprived area of Brazil experience significant shock, fear, and frustration related to their diagnosis, polypharmacy, and the burdens of warfarin therapy, highlighting the need for improved patient education and access to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.
Patients' shock, frustration and warfarin burdens in deprived Brazilian settings highlight support gaps; leaves open how best to improve services.
OBJECTIVE: To provide insight into how people cope with living with atrial fibrillation (AF) and taking oral anticoagulants (OACs), informing how services and healthcare delivery could be improved to offer the appropriate support patients require, thereby optimising their quality of life and well-being. DESIGN: A qualitative study employing focus group discussions (FGDs). SETTING: 11 primary care units in a socioeconomically deprived area of the Butantan district in São Paulo, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥18 years) with AF purposively recruited based on sex, age and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Saturation was met with three FGDs comprising seven, five and five participants, respectively. Theme one focused on self-management, where many participants discussed their methods for adhering to dietary restrictions and alternative medications, including plant-based options and specific foods, and how they modified their daily activities to reduce AF complications and symptoms. Theme two was rationality, where participants described three main ways that they cope with taking long-term medication (often warfarin): thinking that it controls their AF symptoms; it is an obligation; it prevents morbidity and premature death. Theme three was attitude and emotions, where participants described their initial reactions of shock and fear after diagnosis and ongoing emotions of sadness and frustration due to required self-management activities and regular blood tests. Theme four was medication regimen, where participants discussed difficulties with polypharmacy, changes to AF medication (particularly from non-vitamin K antagonist OACs (NOACs) to warfarin), side effects from taking warfarin and various methods of medication management. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents three key findings with implications for patient care and support. First, the shock and fear experienced during diagnosis due to a lack of knowledge about AF suggests that improvements in public knowledge about AF are needed. Second, people with additional chronic conditions may need improved care and support, given the concern participants had regarding when and how to take their medications safely. Third, improved access to NOACs may reduce the difficulties, frustrations and concerns participants had regarding warfarin use (eg, diet, dose adjustments, self-management and monthly international normalised ratio tests).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paschoal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: