Why the study?
Does unilateral cervical vagotomy affect hemodynamics and M2 receptor expression in male Sprague-Dawley rats?
Does unilateral cervical vagotomy affect hemodynamics and M2 receptor expression in male Sprague-Dawley rats?
This preclinical study demonstrates that the working myocardium is bilaterally innervated by the vagus and that compensatory hemodynamic recovery after unilateral vagotomy involves M2 receptor upregulation and increased cholinergic innervation.
Preclinical rat data warrant no clinical translation yet; extends evidence for bilateral vagal innervation and compensatory M2 upregulation.
This study investigated whether each part of the heart is evenly innervated by the left or right vagus and observed the mechanism of compensatory recovery after unilateral cervical vagotomy. HR, BP, LVSP and +/-dp/dt max all decreased one week after left vagotomy, whereas only BP and -dp/dt max decreased one week after right vagotomy. Western blot analyses revealed that the expression of M(2) receptors in the left atrium and left ventricle was upregulated after subacute (1 week) left/right vagotomy. However, significantly more cholinesterase-positive nerves in LV and RV were seen one week after unilateral vagotomy compared to the sham-operated group. In addition, baroreflex sensitivity was increased after subacute right vagotomy. The decreasing effects of ACh (0.5 microg/kg) on LVSP and +/-dp/dt max (but not on HR and BP) were facilitated by subacute unilateral vagotomy. Our present experiments indicate that 1) the working myocardium is innervated bilaterally by the vagus, 2) ventricular contractility is influenced more by denervation of the left than the right vagus and 3) up-regulation of M(2) muscarinic receptors in the left heart, increase of cholinergic nerves, and high baroreflex sensitivity could be involved in the mechanism of compensatory hemodynamic recovery via contralateral vagus overactivity, thereby amplifying contralateral vagal activity and decreasing cardiac contractility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: