PURPOSE: To examine whether the third-trimester fetus can be assessed sonographically using 3-dimensional (3D) volume data sets. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive third-trimester fetuses were evaluated. Fetuses were scanned using 2-dimensional (2D) imaging followed by 5 3D volume acquisitions. The initial scan was interpreted and reported based on the 2D images. The 3D volume data sets were independently reviewed offline several weeks later by 2 sonologists. Parameters evaluated included fetal presentation, placental location, amniotic fluid volume, fetal biometry including a calculation of estimated fetal weight, and major fetal anatomic structures. The result of the interpretation via 3D reconstruction of the volume from each of the 2 sonologists was compared with the original 2D sonography report. RESULTS: Fetal presentation, amniotic fluid volume, and placental location with respect to the cervix were correctly identified 100% of the time by each sonologist. The estimated fetal weight was within 10% of the 2D estimate 89% (95% CI, 0.71-0.98) of the time for sonologist A and 96% (95% CI, 0.81-0.99) of the time for sonologist B. The majority of major anatomic landmarks were adequately seen by both sonologists. CONCLUSION: Offline review of 3D volume data sets is a reliable method for determining fetal presentation, amniotic fluid volume, placental location, and estimating fetal weight in the third trimester.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bromley et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: