Enhanced recovery in Cardiac surgery

Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the enhanced recovery programme between January and December 2014. These were propensity matched using surgeon, gender, status of operation (urgent/elective) number of coronary artery bypass grafts, EuroSCORE and logisticEuroSCORE. All patients were included in the retrospective analysis. Comparison between the groups was made using a t-test. Mean post-operative length of stay was significantly reduced in the ERAS group, 4.05 (SD 1.43) days compared to 5.4 (SD 1.17) days in the non-ERAS group (p = 0.003). There were no hospital or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) readmissions in either group. Mean ICU length of stay was 1 night in both groups. There was no mortality in either group. The rate of re-operation for bleeding was slightly increased in the ERAS group, although this was not significant. There was no significant difference in the frequency of use of endoscopic vein harvest between the two groups. The proportion of cases carried out by non-consultant grade surgeons was higher in the ERAS group, although this did not reach statistical significance.