Previous studies have demonstrated recognition of DNA-containing UV light photoproducts by bacterial (Feng, W.-Y., Lee, E., and Hays, J. B. (1991) Genetics 129, 1007-1020) and human (Mu, D., Tursun, M., Duckett, D. R., Drummond, J. T., Modrich, P., and Sancar, A. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 760-769) long-patch mismatch-repair systems. Mismatch repair directed specifically against incorrect bases inserted during semi-conservative DNA replication might efficiently antagonize UV mutagenesis. To test this hypothesis, DNA 51-mers containing site-specific T-T cis-syn-cyclobutane pyrimidine-dimers or T-T pyrimidine-(6-4')pyrimidinone photoproducts, with all four possible bases opposite the respective 3'-thymines in the photoproducts, were analyzed for the ability to compete with radiolabeled (T/G)-mismatched DNA for binding by highly purified human MSH2.MSH6 heterodimer protein (hMutSalpha). Both (cyclobutane-dimer)/AG and ((6-4)photoproduct)/AG mismatches competed about as well as non-photoproduct T/T mismatches. The two respective pairs of photoproduct/(A(T or C)) mismatches also showed higher hMutSalpha affinity than photoproduct/AA "matches"; the apparent affinity of hMutSalpha for the ((6-4)photoproduct)/AA-"matched" substrate was actually less than that for TT/AA homoduplexes. Surprisingly, although hMutSalpha affinities for both non-photoproduct UU/GG double mismatches and for (uracil-cyclobutane-dimer)/AG single mismatches were high, affinity for the (uracil-cyclobutane-dimer)/GG mismatch was quite low. Equilibrium binding of hMutSalpha to DNA containing (photoproduct/base) mismatches and to (T/G)-mismatched DNA was reduced similarly by ATP (in the absence of magnesium).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: