To determine whether or not petrosal sinus sampling is useful to distinguish patients with mild or intermittent Cushing disease from normal subjects and from individuals with pseudo-Cushing states, we performed bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling for adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) before and after the administration of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in 7 eucortisolemic volunteers, 8 hypercortisolemic patients with pseudo-Cushing states, and 40 patients with ACTHdependent Cushing disease whose urine free cortisol excretion was within the range found in patients having pseudo-Cushing states (<1000nmol/d [<360 μg/d]).The ACTH level, the ratio of the inferior petrosal sinus ACTH to the peripheral vein ACTH concentration (the IPS:P ratio) and the greater ratio of the right to left, or left to right, petrosal sinuses (the R:L ratio) were compared in patients with and without Cushing disease.Maximal petrosal ACTH values were significantly elevated in patients with Cushing disease compared to patients with pseudo-Cushing states before administration of CRH (p<0.001), but not after CRH.Maximal petrosal plasma ACTH values after the administration of CRH as high as 808 pmol/L (3670 pg/mL) and 469 pmol/L (2130 pg/mL) were found in patients with pseudo-Cushing states and in normal volunteers, respectively, whereas maximal petrosal ACTH levels as low as 10 pmol/L (46 pg/mL) were observed in patients with surgically-proven Cushing disease.Maximal IPS:P ratio and minimal IPS:P ratio were significantly greater in patients with Cushing disease than in subjects without Cushing disease before, but not after, CRH.R:L ratios did not differ among groups either before, or after, CRH.All of the subjects without Cushing disease showed large R:L gradients, consistent with the notion of one dominant petrosal sinus containing a greater percentage of pituitary effluent.The ACTH concentrations, the IPS:P ratios, and
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jack A. Yanovski (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: