The performances of three different stochastic optimization methods for all-atom protein structure prediction are investigated and compared. We use the recently developed all-atom free-energy force field (PFF01), which was demonstrated to correctly predict the native conformation of several proteins as the global optimum of the free energy surface. The trp-cage protein (PDB-code 1L2Y) is folded with the stochastic tunneling method, a modified parallel tempering method, and the basin-hopping technique. All the methods correctly identify the native conformation, and their relative efficiency is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schug et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: