Why the study?
Associations of anxiety disorder and depression with CAD are heterogeneous across populations, prompting investigation into how genetic susceptibility alters these associations with incident CAD.
Does diagnosed anxiety disorder or depression increase the risk of incident coronary artery disease, and is this association modified by genetic susceptibility to CAD?
Does diagnosed anxiety disorder or depression increase the risk of incident coronary artery disease, and is this association modified by genetic susceptibility to CAD?
Genetic susceptibility to CAD modifies the association between depression and incident CAD, but does not fully explain the clustering of depression or anxiety with CAD, suggesting other mechanisms like lifestyle mediation play a role.
Anxiety and depression were associated with incident CAD irrespective of genetic susceptibility; leaves open whether targeted mental health interventions reduce CAD risk.
Background Associations of anxiety disorder and depression with coronary artery disease (CAD) are heterogeneous between populations. This study investigated how genetic susceptibility to CAD alters these associations with incident CAD, comparing and combining anxiety disorder and depression. Methods This is a prospective cohort study using UK Biobank. Diagnoses of anxiety disorder and depression were ascertained through linked hospital admission data. Incident CAD was ascertained through hospital admission and death certificate data after baseline. CAD polygenic risk score (PRS CAD ) was obtained from CARDIoGRAMplus4 and categorised into low, intermediate, and high. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between anxiety disorder and depression and CAD. Results Both anxiety disorder (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.92–2.78) and depression (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.90–2.24) were associated with CAD after adjusting for sociodemographic confounders. There was an addictive interaction between depression and PRS CAD (RERI 0.97, 95% CI 0.12–1.81) such that the association between depression and CAD was strongest among those with a high PRS CAD whilst there was no such evidence for anxiety disorder. Anxiety disorder only (HR 1.68, 95% 1.16–2.44), depression only (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.72–2.64), and concomitant anxiety disorder and depression (HR 3.85, 95% CI 2.48–5.98) were associated with CAD even among people with a low PRS CAD . Adjusting for potential mediators attenuated all these associations across PRS categories. Conclusions CAD genetic susceptibility might partly contribute to the clustering of depression and CAD but does not provide a full explanation, nor does it explain the association between anxiety disorder and CAD. Therefore, other mechanisms should be explored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakada et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: