The selection of a particular null hypothesis to be tested in a clinical situation, where only small numbers of homogeneous patients are available, often leads unwittingly to bias in its favor. It is frequently forgotten that failure to obtain a statistically significant result is equivalent to a nondecisive verdict, not to a verdict to reject a hypothesis (null or otherwise). Here the shortcomings of “extensive” models (in which the degrees of freedom do not exceed the number of patients in the sample) are discussed and a shift to an “intensive” model is indicated, based on the acceptance of a general underlying degree of variability in day-to-day behavior and affect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. B. Chassan (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: