Why the study?
Does angiotensin II exposure induce pathological gene expression, arrhythmias, and contractile dysfunction in an in vitro engineered cardiac tissue model?
Does angiotensin II exposure induce pathological gene expression, arrhythmias, and contractile dysfunction in an in vitro engineered cardiac tissue model?
This heart-on-a-chip model demonstrates that acute angiotensin II exposure induces pathological gene expression and functional impairment prior to significant structural remodeling, offering a platform for studying early disease mechanisms.
In vitro disease models offer the ability to study specific systemic features in isolation to better understand underlying mechanisms that lead to dysfunction. Here, we present a cardiac dysfunction model using angiotensin II (ANG II) to elicit pathological responses in a heart-on-a-chip platform that recapitulates native laminar cardiac tissue structure. Our platform, composed of arrays of muscular thin films (MTF), allows for functional comparisons of healthy and diseased tissues by tracking film deflections resulting from contracting tissues. To test our model, we measured gene expression profiles, morphological remodeling, calcium transients, and contractile stress generation in response to ANG II exposure and compared against previous experimental and clinical results. We found that ANG II induced pathological gene expression profiles including over-expression of natriuretic peptide B, Rho GTPase 1, and T-type calcium channels. ANG II exposure also increased proarrhythmic early after depolarization events and significantly reduced peak systolic stresses. Although ANG II has been shown to induce structural remodeling, we control tissue architecture via microcontact printing, and show pathological genetic profiles and functional impairment precede significant morphological changes. We assert that our in vitro model is a useful tool for evaluating tissue health and can serve as a platform for studying disease mechanisms and identifying novel therapeutics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horton et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: