Two‐yr‐old Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris ) seedlings were grown in sand culture for 1 yr with a generous supply of a balanced nutrient solution. Trees were repotted into clean sand in February 1998 and given either a reduced or adequate nutrient supply containing enriched 15 N, 41 K and 26 Mg to label nutrient uptake during spring 1998. Trees doubled their biomass during the experiment. Whole‐tree net photosynthesis was reduced by 43% after 95 d in trees that received the lower nutrient supply ( P < 0.001), although differences in biomass between the two treatments were less pronounced. Remobilization contributed 83, 82 and 52% of the N, K and Mg, respectively, used to support growth of new tissues in trees that received reduced nutrient supply. Those receiving the higher nutrient supply still obtained 44–59% of nutrients used for spring growth of new tissues from remobilization. Current nutrient supply had no significant effect on the amount of N or Mg remobilized to new tissues but K remobilization was less in trees that received the lower nutrient supply ( P = 0.025). The importance of remobilization in young trees and problems associated with quantifying internal cycling of nutrients are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Proe et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: