Why the study?
AS and/or BAV alter aortic flow and elevate wall shear stress, but changes in aortic hemodynamics over time with or without aortic valve replacement remained to be investigated.
Does aortic valve replacement improve aortic hemodynamics in patients with aortic valve stenosis and/or bicuspid aortic valves?
Does aortic valve replacement improve aortic hemodynamics in patients with aortic valve stenosis and/or bicuspid aortic valves?
Aortic valve replacement improves aortic hemodynamics by decreasing peak velocity and wall shear stress, which may help decelerate aortic wall remodeling.
May inform serial 4D flow MRI monitoring in AS/BAV; leaves open whether changes predict outcomes or guide timing of intervention.
Objectives Non-invasive assessment of aortic hemodynamics using four dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides new information on blood flow patterns and wall shear stress (WSS). Aortic valve stenosis (AS) and/or bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) are associated with altered aortic flow patterns and elevated WSS. Aim of this study was to investigate changes in aortic hemodynamics over time in patients with AS and/or BAV with or without aortic valve replacement. Methods We rescheduled 20 patients for a second 4D flow MRI examination, whose first examination was at least 3 years prior. A total of 7 patients received an aortic valve replacement between baseline and follow up examination (=operated group = OP group). Aortic flow patterns (helicity/vorticity) were assessed using a semi-quantitative grading approach from 0 to 3, flow volumes were evaluated in 9 planes, WSS in 18 and peak velocity in 3 areas. Results While most patients had vortical and/or helical flow formations within the aorta, there was no significant change over time. Ascending aortic forward flow volumes were significantly lower in the OP group than in the NOP group at baseline (NOP 69.3 mL ± 14.2 mL vs. OP 55.3 mL ± 1.9 mL p = 0.029). WSS in the outer ascending aorta was significantly higher in the OP group than in the NOP group at baseline (NOP 0.6 ± 0.2 N/m 2 vs. OP 0.8 ± 0.2 N/m 2 , p = 0.008). Peak velocity decreased from baseline to follow up in the aortic arch only in the OP group (1.6 ± 0.6 m/s vs. 1.2 ± 0.3 m/s, p = 0.018). Conclusion Aortic valve replacement influences aortic hemodynamics. The parameters improve after surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wiesemann et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: