The continuous rise of CO 2 emissions is a major cause of global climate change. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is widely seen as a practical technology for reducing CO 2 emissions. CCS mainly consists of capturing CO 2 from large emitting sources and its transportation to a sequestration site where it can be stored safely for a long period of time. The average CO 2 emission growth rate of Korea is 1.0% which is the second highest among the Organization for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) countries. It becomes even more challenging when CO 2 is transported to an offshore storage since there is little experience with subsea pipelines for CO 2 transportation. In this study, a plausible transport and storage model scheme has been developed and then employed to study different offshore CO 2 transportation cases for South Korea as: CO 2 transport in liquid phase (Temperature= −20 ° C, Pressure= 6.50 MPa); CO 2 transport in liquid phase (Temperature= 5 ° C, Pressure= 9.30 MPa); CO 2 transport in supercritical phase (Temperature= 40 ° C, Pressure= 15.00 MPa). CO 2 storage capacity in sedimentary basins of Korea is evaluated between 19 and 27.2 Gt (giga‐ton) of CO 2 . Finally, this paper explores the costs associated with transport and geologic sequestration of CO 2 . Transport cost varies from 10.9 to 15.5 US$/tCO 2 while the storage cost ranges from 20.8 to 21.3 US$/tCO 2 depending on the specific scenario and depth at which CO 2 is stored. Sensitivity analysis showed a decrease in storage cost of 62.4% and 93.6% in 2030 and 2050 respectively for projected CO 2 volumes in Korea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zahid et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: