Why the study?
Following the launch of a women's professional league in Australian Rules football, a marked gender disparity in ACL injury was reported, prompting exploration into how gender differences and inequalities contribute to injury.
Structural sexism and gendered practices across an athlete's life course may contribute to the higher rates of ACL injuries in women's sports, rather than just biological differences.
Gender inequalities may elevate ACL injury risk in women athletes; leaves open empirical tests of entanglement frameworks in contact sports.
This article considers how to approach sporting injury from the perspective of gender/sex entanglement. Taking the case of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, I explore how the gender differences and inequalities that fundamentally shape many sporting environments may contribute to injury in women athletes. I look to Australian Rules football (Aussie Rules)-a male-dominated, high-contact, highly skilled running game and Australia's largest commercial sport-where, following the launch of a women's professional league in 2017, a marked gender disparity in ACL injury has been reported. Rather than attribute this reported disparity to essential biological differences between women and men, I consider how gendered practices and disparities may accumulate across the life course of athletes with consequences for the embodied experiences of women and girls. Building on the concept of structural sexism as a key determinant of health, I document gender-related differences and inequalities at the early childhood, youth, and elite levels of Aussie Rules football. Via this case, I contribute to calls for a dynamic, developmental, and fundamentally gendered approach to studies of injury both in and beyond sport.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madeleine Pape (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: