Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different types of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of indirect composite resins.Materials and Methods: In this study, 2 indirect composite resins (Gradia Plus (GC Inc., Kyoto, Japan, and Ceramage, SHOFU Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and 2 direct composite resins (FiltekZ250, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, USA and GradioSO, VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) were used. A total of 144 discs specimens were prepared. The specimens were randomly divided into 3 subgroups (n=12). Group K: Mylar Strip Band (Control), Group L: Silicone Polisher (Nais, Sofia, Bulgaria), Group D: Super Snap disc (SHOFU, Kyoto, Japan) polishing systems were used. The surface roughness of the specimens was measured using a profilometer (Surftest-211, Kanagawa, Japan). The data were analyzed statistically (p<0.05).Results: The Mylar strip band surface (control) was measured as the smoothest surface in all groups. While the roughest surface measured was polishing with silicone polishers. (p<0.05). While there is no significant statistical difference between the Mylar strip band and yellow rubber polishing system in all materials, a significant difference was found in the Super Snap polishing disc system between Filtek Z250 and Ceramage material (p=0.002).Conclusions: In this study, both the polishing systems used and the materials used had an effect on the surface roughness of indirect resin composites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bahadır et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: