Why the study?
Does current use of aspirin or warfarin reduce the rate of stroke in patients aged 40+ with chronic atrial fibrillation compared to past or no use?
Does current use of aspirin or warfarin reduce the rate of stroke in patients aged 40+ with chronic atrial fibrillation compared to past or no use?
In routine clinical practice, warfarin (but not aspirin) effectively reduces stroke risk in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, though the benefit is smaller than seen in clinical trials.
Warfarin use was associated with lower stroke rates in chronic AF; extends trial findings to real-world cohorts but leaves open confirmation in prospective studies.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of stroke associated with aspirin and warfarin in routine clinical practice. The study included patients aged 40+ with chronic atrial fibrillation (cAF) registered in the UK General Practice Research Database. The outcome was the rate of stroke during current, past and no use of aspirin and warfarin. The study included 51,807 cAF patients. There was no difference in the rate of stroke between current and past use of aspirin (relative rate [RR] = 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 - 1.15]), while the rate of stroke was reduced during current warfarin use compared to past use (RR = 0.62 [95% CI 0.54 - 0.71]). For warfarin, a pattern of lower rates of stroke during current exposure and higher rates with past exposure was seen only in patients treated for at least 6-12 months. For aspirin, no changes in the rates of stroke were observed with discontinuation of aspirin. The effectiveness of warfarin was dependent on the level of anticoagulation, with optimal risk reduction occurring within the recommended international normalised ratio (INR) range of 2.0 to 3.0. The proportion of patients achieving a stable INR within the target therapeutic range was at its lowest during the first three months of warfarin treatment. In conclusion, the results of this study support the effectiveness of warfarin treatment to reduce the rate of stroke in cAF patients in the general clinical practice setting, however the risk reduction is lower than that reported in clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rietbrock et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: