This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Crystalline silicon solar cells face fundamental limitations in infrared (IR) absorption leading to significant solar energy losses. Using upconverting (UC) rare‐earth oxide layers is a potential solution to convert sub‐bandgap photons into higher‐energy photons that Si can absorb. However, integrating UC layers into solar cells can potentially affect surface passivation properties, which may result in recombination of photogenerated charge carriers at Si/UC interface. This study investigates the impact of atomic‐layer‐deposited mixed rare‐earth oxide (Y,Er,Ho) 2 O 3 and Er 2 O 3 UC layers on the passivation quality of Si interface, deposited directly on Si substrate or on the conventional passivation layers, i.e., SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 . Findings reveal that direct deposition provides very weak passivation (τ eff ≈ 4.1 μs) which does not improve with post‐deposition annealing. Similarly, when deposited on top of SiO 2 with optically relevant thickness, the resulting passivation is poor. However, UC layer on top of Al 2 O 3 does not compromise the passivation performance, resulting in low surface recombination velocity of 1.5 cm s −1 for Er 2 O 3 and 1.4 cm s −1 for (Y,Er,Ho) 2 O 3 . Consequently, the results indicate that it should be viable to integrate UC layer like Er 2 O 3 into a state‐of‐the‐art solar cell to improve sub‐bandgap absorption without compromising the passivation properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radfar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: